State fines Duke Energy Progress a record $25.1 million for coal ash contamination at Sutton Plant

State fines Duke Energy Progress a record $25.1 million for coal ash contamination at Sutton Plant

By / Local News / Tuesday, 10 March 2015 04:00

RALEIGH, N.C. : March 10th, 2015 - Governor Pat McCrory’s Department of Environment and Natural Resources today issued Duke Energy Progress the state’s largest-ever penalty for environmental damages, fining the utility $25.1 million for groundwater contamination from coal ash at the Sutton Plant near Wilmington.
DENR fined the utility $25,116,883.61 Tuesday based on the extent of impacts to groundwater, the characteristics of the constituents causing the impacts and the duration of the violations. The calculation for the fine incorporated the state’s investigative costs and a formula taken from state groundwater laws that allows fines to be assessed by multiplying the number of days an individual contaminant leached into groundwater by a civil penalty for each violation. State groundwater violations at other Duke Energy facilities could result in additional fines against the utility.
Under the North Carolina constitution, proceeds from Tuesday’s fine will go to a statewide fund for public schools.
“Today’s enforcement action continues the aggressive approach this administration has taken on coal ash,” said DENR Secretary Donald R. van der Vaart. “In addition to holding the utility accountable for past contamination we have found across the state, we are also moving expeditiously to remove the threat to our waterways and groundwater from coal ash ponds statewide.”
At Sutton, the state agency determined that Duke Energy allowed a host of coal ash contaminants to leach into the groundwater at the facility for several years, in at least a few cases. To determine the civil penalty, state officials used data from water samples of monitoring wells at the facility’s compliance boundaries and multiplied the number of days each individual contaminant leached into groundwater.
In the case of the thallium, for instance, state officials determined that Duke allowed the pollutant to leach into groundwater at the Sutton facility for 1,668 days. State officials multiplied 1,668 by a civil penalty allowed by law of $5,000 per day. The result was a fine of $8,340,000 for thallium alone. Pollutants that are considered a greater public health risk, including thallium, selenium, arsenic and boron, carried heavier penalties than other pollutants, state officials said. The state’s investigative costs totaled $8,883.61.
Tuesday’s fine was issued by a “Findings and Decisions and Assessment of Civil Penalties” to Duke Energy Progress from Jay Zimmerman, director of the N.C. Division of Water Resources. Under state law, Duke Energy has 30 days to respond to the fine and may choose to appeal it to the N.C. Office of Administrative Hearings. Copies of the “Findings and Decisions” document and related documents can be found on DENR’s website at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/guest/duke-coal-ash-facilities
Other large penalties DENR has issued in the past
Before Tuesday’s action, DENR’s largest penalties for environmental violations were a $5.6 million fine the Division of Air Quality issued in 1986 to Texas Gulf (now PCS Phosphate) in Aurora, a $1.4 million fine DAQ issued in 1991 to Weyerhaeuser in Craven County, and a $1 million fine DAQ issued in 1994 to Steelcase in Henderson County. DENR’s other largest fines include the then-Division of Water quality’s $729,000.00 fine against International Paper in 1984, the Division of Waste Management’s fine in 1990 of $598,900 to Porcelanite Tile, the DWM’s fine in 1994 of $589,999 to Akzonobel Surface Chemist, and the DWM’s fine in 2007 of $553,225 to Environmental Quality in Apex.
Sutton history
The Sutton Plant began operation as a coal-fired electric generating station in 1954. The three coal units were retired in 2013 as a new natural gas-fired unit came online at the site.
In August 2014, DENR sent Duke Energy Progress a notice of violation and intent to enforce for Sutton, calling it “the legally required first step toward issuing the utility a fine for violations of the state’s groundwater contamination laws.”
That action followed the filing in 2013 of lawsuits that focused on stopping the violations at Duke Energy’s coal ash ponds.
Tuesday’s action marks the second time in recent months that DENR has reversed decisions made under previous administrations to protect the environment in the Wilmington area. In November 2014, DENR reclassified Sutton Lake as a public resource instead of an industrial cooling pond. The lake, which receives coal ash wastewater discharges from the Sutton plant ash ponds, is now considered to be “waters of the state,” a classification that means the lake will be protected by more stringent water quality standards.
The reclassification followed a document review during which records were found indicating that while the water body met the legal definition for waters of the state, previous department leadership decided to disregard that determination. The lake reclassification also prompted a change in the state’s hazard classification for two dams that are part of the coal ash impoundments at the facility. As a result of the reclassification, the state agency gave Duke Energy 60 days’ notice that its wastewater discharge permit would be reopened. The reclassification may mean additional treatment conditions are placed in the discharge permit or other environmental permits will be required in the future to ensure the health of the lake.
Other fines possible
In addition to the penalties for violating state groundwater standards, penalties for violations of the utility’s federal Clean Water Act permit will be addressed through an enforcement agreement DENR has established with the Environmental Protection Agency.
Closing the coal ash ponds
In September 2014, the Coal Ash Management Act became law, putting the state on a path to closing all the utility’s coal ash ponds. Then in December 2014 the EPA published federal regulations on coal ash that, although largely weaker than North Carolina’s Coal Ash Management Act, reinforce the responsibility of impoundment owners.
Source: NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

Author

Super User

Super User

 



Please publish modules in offcanvas position.